BizGapMap

Home / Full-service restaurants / Oregon / Jackson County, OR

Jackson County, OR — Restaurants Saturation

How many restaurants exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 15 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Sit-down restaurants with table service. Counted together because official statistics use one 722511 code.

Measured density: Above average — 1.21× the U.S. rate (between 1.21× and 1.27× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 5 ZIP cells in this county are withheld. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

Above the U.S. rate   Jackson County restaurants — 121–127% of the U.S. rate

202 restaurants are counted in Jackson County — 7.7 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 121% of the U.S. rate of 6.4.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has risen 7% between 2015 and 2023 (181 → 194). That set is smaller than today's county total. 2020–2021 were pandemic-distorted, and Census rounds counts, so small moves are within noise.

Measured supply density is highest in 97520 (Ashland), 97530 (Jacksonville), 97501 (Medford) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 97503 (White City), 97502 (Central Point), 97524 (Eagle Point).

BLS QCEW puts the latest county-wide count (2026 Q1) at 219 establishments, the freshest available signal.

Measured density: Jackson County sits at 121% of the U.S. rate for restaurants. 5 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 121% and 127% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 97520 and 97530; the lowest measured density is in 97503 and 97502.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing restaurants and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Restaurants
202–212
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (5 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
7.7
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
6.4
per 10,000 present
County index
1.21×
vs. U.S.
Latest quarter (QCEW)
219
2026 Q1 — county total
Residents
221,132
15 ZIPs with data
Workers
79,899
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
221,331
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
−1.1%
−2,424 people
Net migration 2024
+637
international +247, domestic +390
Jobs located here
89,308
LODES 2022, −1.5% since 2019

Jackson County had an estimated 221,331 residents on July 1, 2024 — 1.1% fewer than in 2020 (−2,424). In the latest year it lost 7 people: births minus deaths −641, international migration +247, domestic migration +390. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

89,308 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (−1.5% since 2019), and 87,185 employed residents lived there (−2.6% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

Nonemployer businesses (no paid employees)

Nonemployer businesses
38
no paid employees (2024)
Receipts
$3.6M
published gross receipts
Receipts per business
$94K
gross, not profit

Census Nonemployer Statistics counts businesses with no paid employees — a separate universe from the employer establishments counted above; a business is in one or the other, never both. They are not storefronts by definition: many are home-based, mobile, or part-time.

We show them beside the density index, not inside it. In categories such as nail and beauty salons, child care, and pet care, one-person businesses can outnumber employer establishments, so the employer-only count understates how many businesses exist. That is not evidence of higher demand.

Receipts are gross revenue reported for these businesses — not profit, and not the size of the local market. Census publishes this only at county level, so it is not shown on the ZIP map. See methodology.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more restaurants in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — up 7% since 2015

Number of restaurants in Jackson County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

181
2015
199
2018
199
2020
195
2021
193
2022
194
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
97520 Ashland
279%
97530 Jacksonville
199%
97501 Medford
147%
97504 Medford
113%
97537 Rogue River
105%
97524 Eagle Point
69%
97502 Central Point
61%
97503 White City
28%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
97503 White City
28%
97502 Central Point
61%
97524 Eagle Point
69%
97537 Rogue River
105%
97504 Medford
113%
97501 Medford
147%
97530 Jacksonville
199%
97520 Ashland
279%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few restaurants may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = restaurants per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersRestaurants Per 10kIndexStatus
97520Ashland 26,5128,777 55 17.8 279% Very high density
97530Jacksonville 8,8601,181 12 12.7 199% High density
97501Medford 44,67021,482 52 9.4 147% Above average
97535Phoenix 4,8041,094 5 9.3 146% Above average
97539Shady Cove 3,369308 3 8.5 133% Above average
97504Medford 51,08928,335 47 7.2 113% Above average
97537Rogue River 7,018830 5 6.7 105% Above average
97524Eagle Point 15,0781,747 7 4.4 69% Below average
97502Central Point 29,0678,909 13 3.9 61% Below average
97503White City 13,9385,279 3 1.8 28% Far below average
97522Butte Falls 44359 0–2 — — Not published
97525Gold Hill 5,129628 0–2 — — Not published
97536Prospect 1,30948 0–2 — — Not published
97540Talent 8,3231,185 0–2 — — Not published
97541Trail 1,52337 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Medford

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Medford retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Medford retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Medford retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Jackson County and restaurants

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 722511 — full-service restaurants. Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. BLS QCEW (quarterly) is newer than ZBP — 2026 Q1 shows 219 establishments county-wide for this industry. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (6.39 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.