BizGapMap

Home / Full-service restaurants / Illinois / Winnebago County, IL

Winnebago County, IL — Restaurants Saturation

How many restaurants exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 25 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Sit-down restaurants with table service. Counted together because official statistics use one 722511 code.

Measured density: Range spans bands — 0.98× the U.S. rate (between 0.98× and 1.00× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 9 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 3 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

In line with the U.S. rate   Winnebago County restaurants — 98–100% of the U.S. rate

212 restaurants are counted in Winnebago County — 6.2 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 98% of the U.S. rate of 6.4.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has risen 4% between 2015 and 2023 (200 → 209). That set is smaller than today's county total. 2020–2021 were pandemic-distorted, and Census rounds counts, so small moves are within noise.

Measured supply density is highest in 61108 (Rockford), 61111 (Loves Park), 61104 (Rockford) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 61109 (Rockford), 61115 (Machesney Park), 61103 (Rockford).

BLS QCEW puts the latest county-wide count (2026 Q1) at 204 establishments, the freshest available signal.

Measured density: Winnebago County sits at 98% of the U.S. rate for restaurants. 3 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 98% and 100% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 61108 and 61111; the lowest measured density is in 61109 and 61115.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing restaurants and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Restaurants
212–230
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (9 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
6.2
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
6.4
per 10,000 present
County index
0.98×
vs. U.S.
Latest quarter (QCEW)
204
2026 Q1 — county total
Residents
284,853
19 ZIPs with data
Workers
110,619
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
283,790
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
−0.4%
−1,173 people
Net migration 2024
+1,609
international +1,697, domestic −88
Jobs located here
119,567
LODES 2022, −3.1% since 2019

Winnebago County had an estimated 283,790 residents on July 1, 2024 — 0.4% fewer than in 2020 (−1,173). In the latest year it gained 1,576 people: births minus deaths −32, international migration +1,697, domestic migration −88. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

119,567 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (−3.1% since 2019), and 127,312 employed residents lived there (−4.3% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

Nonemployer businesses (no paid employees)

Nonemployer businesses
29
no paid employees (2024)
Receipts
$2.9M
published gross receipts
Receipts per business
$101K
gross, not profit

Census Nonemployer Statistics counts businesses with no paid employees — a separate universe from the employer establishments counted above; a business is in one or the other, never both. They are not storefronts by definition: many are home-based, mobile, or part-time.

We show them beside the density index, not inside it. In categories such as nail and beauty salons, child care, and pet care, one-person businesses can outnumber employer establishments, so the employer-only count understates how many businesses exist. That is not evidence of higher demand.

Receipts are gross revenue reported for these businesses — not profit, and not the size of the local market. Census publishes this only at county level, so it is not shown on the ZIP map. See methodology.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more restaurants in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — up 4% since 2015

Number of restaurants in Winnebago County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

200
2015
206
2018
203
2020
198
2021
202
2022
209
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
61108 Rockford
193%
61111 Loves Park
151%
61104 Rockford
143%
61016 Cherry Valley
131%
61080 South Beloit
126%
61088 Winnebago
120%
61107 Rockford
100%
61114 Rockford
86%
61101 Rockford
73%
61073 Roscoe
70%
61072 Rockton
65%
61103 Rockford
60%
61115 Machesney Park
54%
61109 Rockford
39%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
61109 Rockford
39%
61115 Machesney Park
54%
61103 Rockford
60%
61072 Rockton
65%
61073 Roscoe
70%
61101 Rockford
73%
61114 Rockford
86%
61107 Rockford
100%
61088 Winnebago
120%
61080 South Beloit
126%
61016 Cherry Valley
131%
61104 Rockford
143%
61111 Loves Park
151%
61108 Rockford
193%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few restaurants may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

Employment hubs & destinations

These ZIPs have far more workers (or visitors) than residents, so their counts are driven by daytime and visitor demand — not a place to read "shortage" from resident numbers alone.

ZIPNeighborhoodType ResidentsWorkersRestaurantsIndex
61112Rockford Destination 1521,813 3 444%

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = restaurants per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersRestaurants Per 10kIndexStatus
61112Rockford 1521,813 3 28.3 444% Very high density
61024Durand 2,318383 6 23.9 374% Very high density
61108Rockford 30,35518,746 49 12.3 193% High density
61111Loves Park 23,28611,539 28 9.6 151% High density
61104Rockford 17,2229,357 20 9.1 143% Above average
61016Cherry Valley 5,4651,046 5 8.4 131% Above average
61080South Beloit 10,9552,964 10 8.0 126% Above average
61088Winnebago 6,167695 5 7.7 120% Above average
61107Rockford 30,76510,782 23 6.4 100% Below average
61114Rockford 15,3255,781 10 5.5 86% Below average
61101Rockford 19,3184,056 10 4.7 73% Below average
61073Roscoe 20,1944,423 10 4.5 70% Below average
61072Rockton 11,2851,544 5 4.1 65% Below average
61103Rockford 22,8696,502 10 3.8 60% Below average
61115Machesney Park 22,3647,533 9 3.4 54% Below average
61109Rockford 26,76818,701 9 2.5 39% Far below average
61063Pecatonica 4,011526 0–2 — — Not published
61077Seward 97141 0–2 — — Not published
61102Rockford 15,9374,087 0–2 — — Not published
61105Rockford —292 0–2 — — Not published
61110Rockford —132 0–2 — — Not published
61125Rockford —5,808 0–2 — — Not published
61126Rockford —17 0–2 — — Not published
61130Loves Park —16 0–2 — — Not published
61132Loves Park —259 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Rockford

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Rockford retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Rockford retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Rockford retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Winnebago County and restaurants

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 722511 — full-service restaurants. Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. BLS QCEW (quarterly) is newer than ZBP — 2026 Q1 shows 204 establishments county-wide for this industry. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (6.39 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.