BizGapMap

Home / Full-service restaurants / Colorado / Adams County, CO

Adams County, CO — Restaurants Saturation

How many restaurants exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 21 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Sit-down restaurants with table service. Counted together because official statistics use one 722511 code.

Measured density: Range spans bands — 0.60× the U.S. rate (between 0.60× and 0.62× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 8 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 5 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

Range spans the U.S. rate   Adams County restaurants — 60–62% of the U.S. rate

212 restaurants are counted in Adams County — 3.8 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 60% of the U.S. rate of 6.4.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has risen 4% between 2015 and 2023 (201 → 209). That set is smaller than today's county total. 2020–2021 were pandemic-distorted, and Census rounds counts, so small moves are within noise.

Measured supply density is highest in 80234 (Denver), 80030 (Westminster), 80031 (Westminster) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 80241 (Thornton), 80602 (Brighton), 80022 (Commerce City).

BLS QCEW puts the latest county-wide count (2026 Q1) at 237 establishments, the freshest available signal.

Measured density: Adams County sits at 60% of the U.S. rate for restaurants. 5 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 60% and 62% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 80234 and 80030; the lowest measured density is in 80241 and 80602.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing restaurants and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Restaurants
212–228
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (8 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
3.8
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
6.4
per 10,000 present
County index
0.60×
vs. U.S.
Latest quarter (QCEW)
237
2026 Q1 — county total
Residents
478,689
18 ZIPs with data
Workers
156,185
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
542,973
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
+4.3%
+22,456 people
Net migration 2024
+4,433
international +3,441, domestic +992
Jobs located here
244,151
LODES 2022, +7.1% since 2019

Adams County had an estimated 542,973 residents on July 1, 2024 — 4.3% more than in 2020 (+22,456). In the latest year it gained 7,296 people: births minus deaths +2,821, international migration +3,441, domestic migration +992. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

244,151 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (+7.1% since 2019), and 255,875 employed residents lived there (+3.5% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
80019 Aurora
+185.1%
80602 Brighton
+23.5%
80022 Commerce City
+18.5%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change

No ZIP had a statistically significant decrease.

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses (no paid employees)

Nonemployer businesses
91
no paid employees (2024)
Receipts
$6.6M
published gross receipts
Receipts per business
$72K
gross, not profit

Census Nonemployer Statistics counts businesses with no paid employees — a separate universe from the employer establishments counted above; a business is in one or the other, never both. They are not storefronts by definition: many are home-based, mobile, or part-time.

We show them beside the density index, not inside it. In categories such as nail and beauty salons, child care, and pet care, one-person businesses can outnumber employer establishments, so the employer-only count understates how many businesses exist. That is not evidence of higher demand.

Receipts are gross revenue reported for these businesses — not profit, and not the size of the local market. Census publishes this only at county level, so it is not shown on the ZIP map. See methodology.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more restaurants in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — up 4% since 2015

Number of restaurants in Adams County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

201
2015
189
2018
196
2020
204
2021
215
2022
209
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
80234 Denver
139%
80030 Westminster
117%
80031 Westminster
111%
80136 Strasburg
96%
80601 Brighton
92%
80229 Denver
67%
80233 Denver
66%
80260 Denver
56%
80221 Denver
44%
80022 Commerce City
39%
80602 Brighton
20%
80241 Thornton
13%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
80241 Thornton
13%
80602 Brighton
20%
80022 Commerce City
39%
80221 Denver
44%
80260 Denver
56%
80233 Denver
66%
80229 Denver
67%
80601 Brighton
92%
80136 Strasburg
96%
80031 Westminster
111%
80030 Westminster
117%
80234 Denver
139%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few restaurants may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

Employment hubs & destinations

These ZIPs have far more workers (or visitors) than residents, so their counts are driven by daytime and visitor demand — not a place to read "shortage" from resident numbers alone.

ZIPNeighborhoodType ResidentsWorkersRestaurantsIndex
80045Aurora Employment hub 1,67615,663 3 49%

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = restaurants per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersRestaurants Per 10kIndexStatus
80234Denver 29,35615,358 33 8.9 139% Above average
80030Westminster 15,4274,040 13 7.5 117% Above average
80031Westminster 35,5847,972 28 7.1 111% Above average
80136Strasburg 6,144759 4 6.1 96% Below average
80601Brighton 42,12711,363 28 5.9 92% Below average
80229Denver 55,09216,653 27 4.3 67% Below average
80233Denver 48,4417,963 22 4.2 66% Below average
80260Denver 34,6773,905 13 3.5 56% Below average
80045Aurora 1,67615,663 3 3.2 49% Far below average
80221Denver 39,71813,526 13 2.8 44% Far below average
80022Commerce City 61,45228,618 19 2.5 39% Far below average
80602Brighton 44,7833,698 6 1.3 20% Far below average
80241Thornton 34,0824,946 3 0.8 13% Far below average
80019Aurora 7,9008,233 0–2 — — Not published
80024Dupont 3332 0–2 — — Not published
80035Westminster —33 0–2 — — Not published
80042Aurora —0 0–2 — — Not published
80102Bennett 6,6901,028 0–2 — — Not published
80137Watkins 1,689721 0–2 — — Not published
80614Eastlake —135 0–2 — — Not published
80640Henderson 13,81811,707 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Commerce City

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Commerce City retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Commerce City retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Commerce City retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Adams County and restaurants

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 722511 — full-service restaurants. Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. BLS QCEW (quarterly) is newer than ZBP — 2026 Q1 shows 237 establishments county-wide for this industry. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (6.39 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.