Home / Pet care & grooming / Michigan

Pet care in Michigan

How many pet care exist per person present (residents + daytime workers) across the 17 Michigan counties we cover, by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Data: Census ZBP 2023 + ACS 2024 + BLS QCEW.

Includes: Pet grooming · Boarding & kennels · Dog day care · Pet sitting services. Counted together because official statistics use one 812910 code.

State verdict (covered counties): Well below the U.S. rate — 47% of the U.S. rate

Counties covered

in Michigan

Pet care

272

establishments (2023)

Per 10,000 present

0.3

residents + 0.5×workers

U.S. average

0.6

per 10,000 present

State index

47%

vs. U.S.

Residents

7,548,988

in covered counties

Workers

3,065,765

jobs in covered counties

Coverage. This page aggregates only the 17 Michigan counties BizGapMap covers — not the whole state. Counts and the index reflect those counties. The aggregate index uses only ZIP cells Census published, so it is a lower bound. Density is a supply-side signal: it counts existing pet care and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more.

Counties in Michigan

City	County	Pet care	Residents	Workers	Per 10k	Index	Verdict
Brighton	Livingston County	15–33	160,573	53,590	0.8	127–262%	Range spans bands
Portage	Kalamazoo County	17–53	256,879	112,688	0.5	86–218%	Range spans bands
Muskegon	Muskegon County	11–33	176,982	51,435	0.5	86–258%	Range spans bands
Ann Arbor	Washtenaw County	22–48	355,204	154,405	0.5	81–139%	Range spans bands
Auburn Hills	Oakland County	75–207	1,282,834	727,774	0.5	72–166%	Range spans bands
Saint Joseph	Berrien County	8–52	163,620	53,561	0.4	67–433%	Range spans bands
Warren	Macomb County	34–98	878,672	296,871	0.3	52–136%	Range spans bands
Holland	Ottawa County	11–41	306,882	129,108	0.3	47–149%	Range spans bands
Grand Rapids	Kent County	25–93	682,712	378,816	0.3	45–125%	Range spans bands
Flint	Genesee County	11–69	422,436	114,470	0.2	36–182%	Range spans bands
East Lansing	Ingham County	7–45	264,810	98,776	0.2	35–187%	Range spans bands
Detroit	Wayne County	33–167	1,792,362	640,223	0.2	25–112%	Range spans bands
Saginaw	Saginaw County	3–43	187,091	76,238	0.1	21–274%	Range spans bands
Jackson	Jackson County	0–36	159,537	50,099	0.0	0–292%	Range spans bands
Port Huron	St. Clair County	0–46	161,718	41,633	0.0	0–365%	Range spans bands
Monroe	Monroe County	0–32	162,298	38,038	0.0	0–280%	Range spans bands
Battle Creek	Calhoun County	0–26	134,378	48,040	0.0	0–240%	Range spans bands

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Lowest vs. highest measured density

Fewest competitors per capita

127%

86%

86%

81%

72%

67%

52%

47%

Most competitors per capita

21%

25%

35%

36%

Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A county with few pet care may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. Use the ranking to find where to look, then verify locally.

← All Pet care & grooming markets nationwide · Methodology · Data sources

Check a ZIP or city · Search by radius · Answers · Data story · Methodology · Data sources · About · Privacy · Terms · Updates (RSS)

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.