BizGapMap

Home / Lowest measured density / Full-service restaurants / Washington

Lowest measured density of restaurants in Washington

Washington has 34 ZIP codes where published counts of restaurants are statistically below the U.S. rate. Coverage is the Washington counties on this site, not the whole state. Same filters as the radius search. Census ZBP 2023 + ACS 2024.

Includes: Sit-down restaurants with table service. Counted together because official statistics use one 722511 code.

Statistically low ZIPs
34
Poisson p < 0.05
Comparable ZIPs
168
published count ≥ 5, ≥ 10,000 residents
U.S. rate
6.4
per 10,000 present

Coverage. Only the Washington counties BizGapMap covers, not the whole state. A missing state page means no ZIP there cleared the test — we do not publish an empty list.

Lowest measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A low published count can mean weak demand, no suitable space, commuters spending elsewhere, or businesses with no paid employees that ZBP does not count. Each line is a question to check locally.

False positives. The test is one-sided at 5% with no correction for looking at many ZIPs. Of 168 comparable ZIPs here, about 8 could clear the bar by chance. Small ZIPs rarely reach significance, so “not on this list” does not mean “no gap”.

ZIP codes

ZIPCityCounty RestaurantsExpected IndexBandZIP type ResidentsTest
98374 Puyallup Pierce County 9 33.4 27% Far below average Residential 49,007 p < 0.001
98092 Auburn King County 9 33.3 27% Far below average Residential 50,224 p < 0.001
98074 Sammamish King County 6 20.6 29% Far below average Residential 30,761 p < 0.001
98387 Spanaway Pierce County 10 33.7 30% Far below average Residential 50,774 p < 0.001
98229 Bellingham Whatcom County 7 22.8 31% Far below average Residential 33,298 p < 0.001
98178 Seattle King County 6 17.7 34% Far below average Residential 26,748 p < 0.01
98177 Seattle King County 5 14.0 36% Far below average Residential 21,090 p < 0.01
98338 Graham Pierce County 8 21.7 37% Far below average Residential 32,687 p < 0.001
98686 Vancouver Clark County 6 16.1 37% Far below average Residential 21,243 p < 0.01
98682 Vancouver Clark County 18 47.7 38% Far below average Residential 68,305 p < 0.001
98664 Vancouver Clark County 7 17.4 40% Far below average Residential 23,845 p < 0.01
98296 Snohomish Snohomish County 8 19.4 41% Far below average Residential 27,896 p < 0.01
98001 Auburn King County 15 33.3 45% Far below average Mixed 37,460 p < 0.001
99217 Spokane Spokane County 7 15.3 46% Far below average Residential 21,441 p ≈ 0.015
99208 Spokane Spokane County 19 40.9 46% Far below average Residential 58,669 p < 0.001
98055 Renton King County 11 23.2 47% Far below average Mixed 24,660 p < 0.01
98391 Bonney Lake Pierce County 21 40.0 52% Below average Residential 59,240 p < 0.001
98512 Olympia Thurston County 12 22.8 53% Below average Residential 31,864 p ≈ 0.010
98258 Lake Stevens Snohomish County 19 35.9 53% Below average Residential 52,752 p < 0.01
98023 Federal Way King County 18 33.5 54% Below average Residential 50,448 p < 0.01
98029 Issaquah King County 12 22.3 54% Below average Residential 30,586 p ≈ 0.013
99224 Spokane Spokane County 11 20.4 54% Below average Mixed 24,919 p ≈ 0.018
98498 Lakewood Pierce County 11 20.1 55% Below average Residential 29,209 p ≈ 0.020
98058 Renton King County 16 28.6 56% Below average Residential 42,980 p < 0.01
98642 Ridgefield Clark County 11 19.5 56% Below average Residential 26,816 p ≈ 0.027
98248 Ferndale Whatcom County 12 21.3 56% Below average Residential 28,498 p ≈ 0.022
98404 Tacoma Pierce County 14 24.7 57% Below average Residential 35,961 p ≈ 0.014
98198 Seattle King County 16 28.1 57% Below average Residential 40,463 p < 0.01
98671 Washougal Clark County 10 17.2 58% Below average Residential 24,871 p ≈ 0.045
98042 Kent King County 20 34.3 58% Below average Residential 50,216 p < 0.01
98155 Seattle King County 15 24.8 60% Below average Residential 36,511 p ≈ 0.024
98087 Lynnwood Snohomish County 19 28.9 66% Below average Residential 41,796 p ≈ 0.033
98223 Arlington Snohomish County 23 34.3 67% Below average Residential 46,497 p ≈ 0.027
98204 Everett Snohomish County 33 44.3 74% Below average Mixed 45,130 p ≈ 0.047

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns. Sorted by measured density, lowest first.

How this is built

Who can be listed. ZIPs in the covered counties whose county has at least 15 ZIPs in our data, with at least 10,000 residents, and at least 5 published businesses in this industry. Census hides counts of 0–2; derived remainders are excluded.

Statistically low. P(X ≤ n | expected) < 0.05, where expected is the U.S. establishments-per-person-present rate times this ZIP’s demand (residents + 0.5 × jobs located here). Same definition as the index, so the percentage and the test cannot disagree. Full test →

ZIP type is jobs per resident, not zoning. A residential ZIP can look low because residents shop near work.

Questions

What does “lowest measured density” mean for restaurants? A ZIP is listed only when Census published at least 5 restaurants with paid employees, the ZIP has at least 10,000 residents, and a one-sided Poisson test finds the count statistically below the U.S. rate (p < 0.05). Index 100% is the national density per person present.

Is a low-density ZIP a place to open this kind of business? No. A low published count of restaurants can mean weak demand, no suitable space, residents shopping near work, or businesses with no paid employees that Census ZBP does not count. Each line is a question to check locally, not a recommendation.

Why is a state missing from this list? A state page exists only when at least one ZIP in the counties we cover clears the same test as the radius search. We do not publish an empty list. Coverage is those counties, not the whole state.

← All states for restaurants  ·  Restaurants in Washington (county totals)  ·  Search by radius

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.