BizGapMap

Home / Hotels & motels / California / Placer County, CA

Placer County, CA — Hotels Saturation

How many hotels exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 29 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Hotels · Motels · Motor inns. Counted together because official statistics use one 721110 code.

Measured density: Range spans bands — 0.72× the U.S. rate (between 0.72× and 1.32× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 21 ZIP cells in this county are withheld. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

Range spans the U.S. rate   Placer County hotels — 72–132% of the U.S. rate

50 hotels are counted in Placer County — 1.0 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 72% of the U.S. rate of 1.4.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has stayed roughly flat between 2015 and 2023 (47 → 46).

Measured supply density is highest in 95603 (Auburn), 95661 (Roseville), 95746 (Granite Bay) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 95677 (Rocklin), 95678 (Roseville), 95746 (Granite Bay).

Census County Business Patterns (2023) puts the county-wide count at 62 establishments, including locations in ZIP codes that do not map to a ZCTA — so it can run slightly above the sum of the ZIP rows on this page. It is annual, so it lags more than QCEW.

Measured density: Placer County sits at 72% of the U.S. rate for hotels. 21 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 72% and 132% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 95603 and 95661; the lowest measured density is in 95677 and 95678.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing hotels and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Hotels
50–92
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (21 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
1.0
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
1.4
per 10,000 present
County index
0.72×
vs. U.S.
Latest year (CBP)
62
2023 — $140M annual payroll
Residents
422,233
29 ZIPs with data
Workers
166,507
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
433,822
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
+6.9%
+27,871 people
Net migration 2024
+9,517
international +2,011, domestic +7,506
Jobs located here
184,679
LODES 2022, +6.9% since 2019

Placer County had an estimated 433,822 residents on July 1, 2024 — 6.9% more than in 2020 (+27,871). In the latest year it gained 9,223 people: births minus deaths −246, international migration +2,011, domestic migration +7,506. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

184,679 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (+6.9% since 2019), and 179,252 employed residents lived there (+8.1% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
96145 Tahoe City
+60.3%
95747 Roseville
+25.4%
95677 Rocklin
+14.6%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change

No ZIP had a statistically significant decrease.

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses

Not shown. Census publishes hotels only combined with other traveler accommodation (NAICS 7211), so a hotels-and-motels-only nonemployer count is not published.

Census Nonemployer Statistics 2024 (NAICS 2022). We do not approximate this figure.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more hotels in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — down 2% since 2015

Number of hotels in Placer County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

47
2015
50
2018
54
2020
53
2021
48
2022
46
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
95603 Auburn
167%
95661 Roseville
153%
95746 Granite Bay
115%
95678 Roseville
114%
95677 Rocklin
102%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
95677 Rocklin
102%
95678 Roseville
114%
95746 Granite Bay
115%
95661 Roseville
153%
95603 Auburn
167%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few hotels may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

Employment hubs & destinations

These ZIPs have far more workers (or visitors) than residents, so their counts are driven by daytime and visitor demand — not a place to read "shortage" from resident numbers alone.

ZIPNeighborhoodType ResidentsWorkersHotelsIndex
96146Olympic Valley Employment hub 1,1544,049 5 1139%
95604Auburn Employment hub 27106 0–2 —

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = hotels per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersHotels Per 10kIndexStatus
96148Tahoe Vista 562470 4 50.2 3635% Very high density
96146Olympic Valley 1,1544,049 5 15.7 1139% Very high density
96145Tahoe City 3,4412,305 3 6.5 473% Very high density
95603Auburn 28,43212,350 8 2.3 167% High density
95661Roseville 32,58939,068 11 2.1 153% High density
95746Granite Bay 22,9854,406 4 1.6 115% Above average
95678Roseville 45,34636,431 10 1.6 114% Above average
95677Rocklin 29,20612,544 5 1.4 102% Above average
95602Auburn 19,7015,148 0–2 — — Not published
95604Auburn 27106 0–2 — — Not published
95631Foresthill 6,946342 0–2 — — Not published
95648Lincoln 57,45911,201 0–2 — — Not published
95650Loomis 13,4055,038 0–2 — — Not published
95658Newcastle 5,894884 0–2 — — Not published
95663Penryn 3,090620 0–2 — — Not published
95681Sheridan 1,267177 0–2 — — Not published
95701Alta 98458 0–2 — — Not published
95703Applegate 2,589242 0–2 — — Not published
95713Colfax 9,448972 0–2 — — Not published
95714Dutch Flat 39448 0–2 — — Not published
95715Emigrant Gap 6120 0–2 — — Not published
95717Gold Run 5540 0–2 — — Not published
95722Meadow Vista 4,092526 0–2 — — Not published
95736Weimar 331350 0–2 — — Not published
95747Roseville 83,90211,074 0–2 — — Not published
95765Rocklin 43,87116,662 0–2 — — Not published
96140Carnelian Bay 1,171287 0–2 — — Not published
96141Homewood 609443 0–2 — — Not published
96143Kings Beach 3,222646 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Roseville

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Roseville retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Roseville retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Roseville retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Placer County and hotels

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 721110 — hotels (except casino hotels) and motels. Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. This industry has no clean QCEW series, so the freshest county signal is Census County Business Patterns 2023: 62 establishments and $140M in annual payroll county-wide. This count includes locations in ZIP codes that do not map to a ZCTA, so it can be slightly higher than the sum of the ZIP rows. CBP is annual and slower than QCEW. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (1.38 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.