BizGapMap

Home / Fitness & recreational sports centers / Maryland / Anne Arundel County, MD

Anne Arundel County, MD — Gyms Saturation

How many gyms exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 38 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Gyms & fitness centers · CrossFit boxes · Boxing, martial arts & dance studios · Recreational sports centers. Counted together because official statistics use one 713940 code.

Measured density: Range spans bands — 1.16× the U.S. rate (between 1.16× and 1.78× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 25 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 22 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

Range spans the U.S. rate   Anne Arundel County gyms — 116–178% of the U.S. rate

83 gyms are counted in Anne Arundel County — 1.2 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 116% of the U.S. rate of 1.0.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has risen 31% between 2015 and 2023 (61 → 80). That set is smaller than today's county total. 2020–2021 were pandemic-distorted, and Census rounds counts, so small moves are within noise.

Measured supply density is highest in 21401 (Annapolis), 21054 (Gambrills), 21146 (Severna Park) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 21061 (Glen Burnie), 21076 (Hanover), 21113 (Odenton).

BLS QCEW puts the latest county-wide count (2026 Q1) at 91 establishments, the freshest available signal.

Measured density: Anne Arundel County sits at 116% of the U.S. rate for gyms. 22 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 116% and 178% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 21401 and 21054; the lowest measured density is in 21061 and 21076.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing gyms and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Gyms
83–133
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (25 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
1.2
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
1.0
per 10,000 present
County index
1.16×
vs. U.S.
Latest quarter (QCEW)
91
2026 Q1 — county total
Residents
579,103
35 ZIPs with data
Workers
233,423
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
602,350
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
+1.5%
+8,938 people
Net migration 2024
+416
international +2,448, domestic −2,032
Jobs located here
262,961
LODES 2022, −2.8% since 2019

Anne Arundel County had an estimated 602,350 residents on July 1, 2024 — 1.5% more than in 2020 (+8,938). In the latest year it gained 2,385 people: births minus deaths +1,955, international migration +2,448, domestic migration −2,032. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

262,961 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (−2.8% since 2019), and 256,441 employed residents lived there (−4.4% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
21054 Gambrills
+46.3%
21076 Hanover
+39.1%
21060 Glen Burnie
+13.8%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change

No ZIP had a statistically significant decrease.

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses

Not shown. NES 2024 does not publish fitness and recreational sports centers (NAICS 71394); only the broader recreation group (7139) is available.

Census Nonemployer Statistics 2024 (NAICS 2022). We do not approximate this figure.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more gyms in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — up 31% since 2015

Number of gyms in Anne Arundel County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

61
2015
71
2018
72
2020
78
2021
79
2022
80
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
21401 Annapolis
336%
21054 Gambrills
330%
21146 Severna Park
296%
21108 Millersville
222%
20724 Laurel
183%
21012 Arnold
160%
21403 Annapolis
135%
21409 Annapolis
134%
21122 Pasadena
102%
21114 Crofton
97%
21113 Odenton
97%
21076 Hanover
95%
21061 Glen Burnie
84%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
21061 Glen Burnie
84%
21076 Hanover
95%
21113 Odenton
97%
21114 Crofton
97%
21122 Pasadena
102%
21409 Annapolis
134%
21403 Annapolis
135%
21012 Arnold
160%
20724 Laurel
183%
21108 Millersville
222%
21146 Severna Park
296%
21054 Gambrills
330%
21401 Annapolis
336%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few gyms may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

Employment hubs & destinations

These ZIPs have far more workers (or visitors) than residents, so their counts are driven by daytime and visitor demand — not a place to read "shortage" from resident numbers alone.

ZIPNeighborhoodType ResidentsWorkersGymsIndex
21077Harmans Destination 631,107 0–2 —
21090Linthicum Heights Employment hub 10,65225,070 0–2 —

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = gyms per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersGyms Per 10kIndexStatus
21401Annapolis 38,62944,530 21 3.4 336% Very high density
21054Gambrills 16,3868,593 7 3.4 330% Very high density
21146Severna Park 28,5918,579 10 3.0 296% Very high density
21108Millersville 18,6436,647 5 2.3 222% High density
20724Laurel 19,3693,745 4 1.9 183% High density
21012Arnold 22,5703,428 4 1.6 160% High density
21403Annapolis 32,6816,546 5 1.4 135% Above average
21409Annapolis 20,2893,155 3 1.4 134% Above average
21122Pasadena 61,56610,845 7 1.0 102% Above average
21114Crofton 25,5908,899 3 1.0 97% Below average
21113Odenton 36,7056,845 4 1.0 97% Below average
21076Hanover 24,26833,304 4 1.0 95% Below average
21061Glen Burnie 57,23023,921 6 0.9 84% Below average
20711Lothian 7,7311,236 0–2 — — Not published
20733Churchton 2,669260 0–2 — — Not published
20751Deale 2,851670 0–2 — — Not published
20755Fort George G Meade 11,2252,641 0–2 — — Not published
20758Friendship 71440 0–2 — — Not published
20764Shady Side 2,993164 0–2 — — Not published
20765Galesville 668202 0–2 — — Not published
20776Harwood 3,315630 0–2 — — Not published
20778West River 2,211373 0–2 — — Not published
20779Tracys Landing 883322 0–2 — — Not published
21032Crownsville 8,8501,475 0–2 — — Not published
21035Davidsonville 7,8791,967 0–2 — — Not published
21037Edgewater 20,8545,522 0–2 — — Not published
21056Gibson Island 291133 0–2 — — Not published
21060Glen Burnie 39,7307,818 0–2 — — Not published
21077Harmans 631,107 0–2 — — Not published
21090Linthicum Heights 10,65225,070 0–2 — — Not published
21106Mayo —52 0–2 — — Not published
21140Riva 4,417253 0–2 — — Not published
21144Severn 37,1184,418 0–2 — — Not published
21226Curtis Bay 6,6749,582 0–2 — — Not published
21240Baltimore 010,902 0–2 — — Not published
21402Annapolis 4,303439 0–2 — — Not published
21404Annapolis —166 0–2 — — Not published
21405Annapolis 49564 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Annapolis

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Annapolis retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Annapolis retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Annapolis retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Anne Arundel County and gyms

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 713940 — fitness & recreational sports centers (gyms). Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. BLS QCEW (quarterly) is newer than ZBP — 2026 Q1 shows 91 establishments county-wide for this industry. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (1.03 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.