BizGapMap

Home / Fitness & recreational sports centers / Massachusetts / Suffolk County, MA

Suffolk County, MA — Gyms Saturation

How many gyms exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 43 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Gyms & fitness centers · CrossFit boxes · Boxing, martial arts & dance studios · Recreational sports centers. Counted together because official statistics use one 713940 code.

Measured density: Range spans bands — 0.97× the U.S. rate (between 0.97× and 1.19× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 23 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 13 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

Range spans the U.S. rate   Suffolk County gyms — 97–119% of the U.S. rate

113 gyms are counted in Suffolk County — 1.0 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 97% of the U.S. rate of 1.0.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has risen 3% between 2015 and 2023 (98 → 101). That set is smaller than today's county total. 2020–2021 were pandemic-distorted, and Census rounds counts, so small moves are within noise.

Measured supply density is highest in 02127 (South Boston), 02152 (Winthrop), 02129 (Charlestown) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 02151 (Revere), 02128 (East Boston), 02135 (Brighton).

BLS QCEW puts the latest county-wide count (2026 Q1) at 136 establishments, the freshest available signal.

Measured density: Suffolk County sits at 97% of the U.S. rate for gyms. 13 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 97% and 119% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 02127 and 02152; the lowest measured density is in 02151 and 02128.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing gyms and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Gyms
113–159
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (23 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
1.0
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
1.0
per 10,000 present
County index
0.97×
vs. U.S.
Latest quarter (QCEW)
136
2026 Q1 — county total
Residents
780,506
33 ZIPs with data
Workers
719,212
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
793,144
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
−0.5%
−4,095 people
Net migration 2024
+7,951
international +18,922, domestic −10,971
Jobs located here
716,342
LODES 2022, −0.1% since 2019

Suffolk County had an estimated 793,144 residents on July 1, 2024 — 0.5% fewer than in 2020 (−4,095). In the latest year it gained 11,466 people: births minus deaths +3,541, international migration +18,922, domestic migration −10,971. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

716,342 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (−0.1% since 2019), and 389,335 employed residents lived there (−2.9% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
02210 Boston
+87.6%
02151 Revere
+11.8%
02152 Winthrop
+1.2%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
02131 Roslindale
−9.5%

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses

Not shown. NES 2024 does not publish fitness and recreational sports centers (NAICS 71394); only the broader recreation group (7139) is available.

Census Nonemployer Statistics 2024 (NAICS 2022). We do not approximate this figure.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more gyms in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — up 3% since 2015

Number of gyms in Suffolk County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

98
2015
102
2018
104
2020
107
2021
105
2022
101
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
02127 South Boston
185%
02152 Winthrop
149%
02129 Charlestown
146%
02136 Hyde Park
146%
02118 Boston
146%
02130 Jamaica Plain
104%
02132 West Roxbury
101%
02124 Dorchester Center
99%
02131 Roslindale
86%
02135 Brighton
76%
02128 East Boston
69%
02151 Revere
61%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
02151 Revere
61%
02128 East Boston
69%
02135 Brighton
76%
02131 Roslindale
86%
02124 Dorchester Center
99%
02132 West Roxbury
101%
02130 Jamaica Plain
104%
02118 Boston
146%
02136 Hyde Park
146%
02129 Charlestown
146%
02152 Winthrop
149%
02127 South Boston
185%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few gyms may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

Employment hubs & destinations

These ZIPs have far more workers (or visitors) than residents, so their counts are driven by daytime and visitor demand — not a place to read "shortage" from resident numbers alone.

ZIPNeighborhoodType ResidentsWorkersGymsIndex
02108Boston Employment hub 3,79422,279 5 326%
02116Boston Employment hub 21,97881,339 15 233%
02111Boston Employment hub 8,40736,744 6 218%
02109Boston Destination 3,61249,551 5 172%
02114Boston Employment hub 14,41847,110 6 154%
02115Boston Employment hub 29,70569,781 10 151%
02110Boston Destination 2,34269,473 5 131%
02210Boston Employment hub 6,97167,457 5 120%
02199Boston Destination 1,29223,042 0–2 —
02215Boston Employment hub 24,58159,623 0–2 —

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = gyms per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersGyms Per 10kIndexStatus
02108Boston 3,79422,279 5 3.3 326% Very high density
02116Boston 21,97881,339 15 2.4 233% High density
02111Boston 8,40736,744 6 2.2 218% High density
02127South Boston 36,76910,661 8 1.9 185% High density
02109Boston 3,61249,551 5 1.8 172% High density
02114Boston 14,41847,110 6 1.6 154% High density
02115Boston 29,70569,781 10 1.5 151% High density
02152Winthrop 18,7591,799 3 1.5 149% Above average
02129Charlestown 20,03213,245 4 1.5 146% Above average
02136Hyde Park 37,2655,452 6 1.5 146% Above average
02118Boston 28,94622,438 6 1.5 146% Above average
02110Boston 2,34269,473 5 1.3 131% Above average
02210Boston 6,97167,457 5 1.2 120% Above average
02130Jamaica Plain 40,05513,822 5 1.1 104% Above average
02132West Roxbury 26,4445,038 3 1.0 101% Above average
02124Dorchester Center 56,2165,592 6 1.0 99% Below average
02131Roslindale 31,1515,587 3 0.9 86% Below average
02135Brighton 43,14916,744 4 0.8 76% Below average
02128East Boston 43,34526,928 4 0.7 69% Below average
02151Revere 60,0128,546 4 0.6 61% Below average
02112Boston —29 0–2 — — Not published
02113Boston 6,3852,742 0–2 — — Not published
02117Boston —1,269 0–2 — — Not published
02119Roxbury 27,3777,413 0–2 — — Not published
02120Roxbury Crossing 15,2833,682 0–2 — — Not published
02121Dorchester 29,0402,317 0–2 — — Not published
02122Dorchester 23,4798,147 0–2 — — Not published
02123Boston —126 0–2 — — Not published
02125Dorchester 33,66210,196 0–2 — — Not published
02126Mattapan 26,5832,125 0–2 — — Not published
02133Boston 6247 0–2 — — Not published
02134Allston 17,6676,714 0–2 — — Not published
02137Readville —50 0–2 — — Not published
02150Chelsea 39,90812,993 0–2 — — Not published
02163Boston 1,817585 0–2 — — Not published
02196Boston —16 0–2 — — Not published
02199Boston 1,29223,042 0–2 — — Not published
02201Boston —35 0–2 — — Not published
02203Boston 020 0–2 — — Not published
02205Boston 0186 0–2 — — Not published
02212Boston —16 0–2 — — Not published
02215Boston 24,58159,623 0–2 — — Not published
02222Boston —27 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Boston

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Boston retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Boston retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Boston retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Suffolk County and gyms

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 713940 — fitness & recreational sports centers (gyms). Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. BLS QCEW (quarterly) is newer than ZBP — 2026 Q1 shows 136 establishments county-wide for this industry. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (1.03 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.