BizGapMap

Home / Grocery stores & supermarkets / Michigan / Oakland County, MI

Oakland County, MI — Grocery stores Saturation

How many grocery stores exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 84 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Supermarkets · Grocery stores · Neighborhood food markets. Counted together because official statistics use one 445110 code.

Measured density: Below average — 0.73× the U.S. rate (between 0.73× and 0.96× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 46 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 29 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

Range spans the U.S. rate   Oakland County grocery stores — 73–96% of the U.S. rate

187 grocery stores are counted in Oakland County — 1.1 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 73% of the U.S. rate of 1.6.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has fallen 5% between 2015 and 2023 (177 → 169). That set is smaller than today's county total. 2020–2021 were pandemic-distorted, and Census rounds counts, so small moves are within noise.

Measured supply density is highest in 48334 (Farmington), 48357 (Highland), 48342 (Pontiac) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 48073 (Royal Oak), 48307 (Rochester), 48075 (Southfield).

BLS QCEW puts the latest county-wide count (2026 Q1) at 212 establishments, the freshest available signal.

Measured density: Oakland County sits at 73% of the U.S. rate for grocery stores. 29 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 73% and 96% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 48334 and 48357; the lowest measured density is in 48073 and 48307.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing grocery stores and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Grocery stores
187–279
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (46 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
1.1
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
1.6
per 10,000 present
County index
0.73×
vs. U.S.
Latest quarter (QCEW)
212
2026 Q1 — county total
Residents
1,282,834
67 ZIPs with data
Workers
727,774
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
1,296,888
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
+1.9%
+24,362 people
Net migration 2024
+13,721
international +18,153, domestic −4,432
Jobs located here
726,660
LODES 2021, −6.6% since 2019

Oakland County had an estimated 1,296,888 residents on July 1, 2024 — 1.9% more than in 2020 (+24,362). In the latest year it gained 15,052 people: births minus deaths +1,288, international migration +18,153, domestic migration −4,432. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

726,660 jobs were located in the county in 2021 (−6.6% since 2019), and 563,863 employed residents lived there (−6.6% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2021 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend. The 2022 file for this state is not usable, so 2021 is the latest year shown.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
48165 New Hudson
+27.4%
48377 Novi
+18.4%
48393 Wixom
+18.1%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
48320 Keego Harbor
−13.3%
48030 Hazel Park
−9.5%
48071 Madison Heights
−5.6%

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses

Not shown. Census publishes grocery stores only combined with convenience stores in this dataset, so a grocery-only nonemployer count is not published.

Census Nonemployer Statistics 2024 (NAICS 2022). We do not approximate this figure.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more grocery stores in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — down 5% since 2015

Number of grocery stores in Oakland County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

177
2015
183
2018
188
2020
174
2021
164
2022
169
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
48334 Farmington
215%
48357 Highland
195%
48342 Pontiac
186%
48237 Oak Park
175%
48390 Walled Lake
156%
48034 Southfield
152%
48009 Birmingham
149%
48220 Ferndale
148%
48017 Clawson
147%
48328 Waterford
142%
48340 Pontiac
133%
48071 Madison Heights
129%
48336 Farmington
121%
48322 West Bloomfield
116%
48362 Lake Orion
116%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
48073 Royal Oak
46%
48307 Rochester
58%
48075 Southfield
69%
48329 Waterford
71%
48346 Clarkston
72%
48382 Commerce Township
72%
48178 South Lyon
80%
48085 Troy
80%
48309 Rochester
83%
48067 Royal Oak
84%
48393 Wixom
89%
48083 Troy
90%
48375 Novi
95%
48348 Clarkston
97%
48386 White Lake
100%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few grocery stores may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

Employment hubs & destinations

These ZIPs have far more workers (or visitors) than residents, so their counts are driven by daytime and visitor demand — not a place to read "shortage" from resident numbers alone.

ZIPNeighborhoodType ResidentsWorkersGrocery storesIndex
48084Troy Employment hub 15,96042,532 4 69%
48326Auburn Hills Employment hub 24,51461,963 3 35%

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = grocery stores per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersGrocery stores Per 10kIndexStatus
48334Farmington 19,61820,591 10 3.3 215% High density
48357Highland 8,7182,336 3 3.0 195% High density
48342Pontiac 17,5646,412 6 2.9 186% High density
48237Oak Park 29,3187,626 9 2.7 175% High density
48390Walled Lake 23,9399,857 7 2.4 156% High density
48034Southfield 14,79629,575 7 2.4 152% High density
48009Birmingham 21,77217,066 7 2.3 149% Above average
48220Ferndale 21,5279,144 6 2.3 148% Above average
48017Clawson 11,3503,620 3 2.3 147% Above average
48328Waterford 24,4785,444 6 2.2 142% Above average
48340Pontiac 25,6696,764 6 2.1 133% Above average
48071Madison Heights 28,41922,868 8 2.0 129% Above average
48336Farmington 26,43210,708 6 1.9 121% Above average
48322West Bloomfield 32,88511,793 7 1.8 116% Above average
48362Lake Orion 14,9663,416 3 1.8 116% Above average
48301Bloomfield Hills 14,6824,318 3 1.8 115% Above average
48302Bloomfield Hills 17,50510,644 4 1.8 113% Above average
48076Southfield 25,40517,788 6 1.7 113% Above average
48327Waterford 20,9604,841 4 1.7 110% Above average
48323West Bloomfield 17,2352,746 3 1.6 104% Above average
48335Farmington 25,07714,430 5 1.5 100% Below average
48386White Lake 17,8563,040 3 1.5 100% Below average
48348Clarkston 24,5743,910 4 1.5 97% Below average
48375Novi 24,02919,397 5 1.5 95% Below average
48083Troy 23,77138,686 6 1.4 90% Below average
48393Wixom 20,14517,775 4 1.4 89% Below average
48067Royal Oak 24,86811,460 4 1.3 84% Below average
48309Rochester 30,68516,075 5 1.3 83% Below average
48085Troy 27,2319,479 4 1.3 80% Below average
48178South Lyon 37,7894,611 5 1.2 80% Below average
48382Commerce Township 24,4794,280 3 1.1 72% Below average
48346Clarkston 23,1677,498 3 1.1 72% Below average
48329Waterford 24,7154,787 3 1.1 71% Below average
48084Troy 15,96042,532 4 1.1 69% Below average
48075Southfield 22,84128,976 4 1.1 69% Below average
48307Rochester 44,71421,200 5 0.9 58% Below average
48073Royal Oak 33,10616,949 3 0.7 46% Far below average
48326Auburn Hills 24,51461,963 3 0.5 35% Far below average
48007Troy —209 0–2 — — Not published
48012Birmingham —93 0–2 — — Not published
48025Franklin 14,73411,743 0–2 — — Not published
48030Hazel Park 14,9634,379 0–2 — — Not published
48033Southfield 17,27718,086 0–2 — — Not published
48037Southfield —416 0–2 — — Not published
48068Royal Oak —175 0–2 — — Not published
48069Pleasant Ridge 2,602261 0–2 — — Not published
48070Huntington Woods 6,328481 0–2 — — Not published
48072Berkley 15,1493,081 0–2 — — Not published
48086Southfield —372 0–2 — — Not published
48098Troy 20,93623,670 0–2 — — Not published
48099Troy —606 0–2 — — Not published
48165New Hudson 9,5665,480 0–2 — — Not published
48303Bloomfield Hills —953 0–2 — — Not published
48304Bloomfield Hills 17,3879,411 0–2 — — Not published
48306Rochester 28,3892,601 0–2 — — Not published
48308Rochester —18 0–2 — — Not published
48320Keego Harbor 4,2772,007 0–2 — — Not published
48321Auburn Hills —236 0–2 — — Not published
48324West Bloomfield 17,0981,254 0–2 — — Not published
48325West Bloomfield —57 0–2 — — Not published
48330Drayton Plains —6 0–2 — — Not published
48331Farmington 21,56222,442 0–2 — — Not published
48332Farmington —292 0–2 — — Not published
48333Farmington —37 0–2 — — Not published
48341Pontiac 18,92417,441 0–2 — — Not published
48343Pontiac —358 0–2 — — Not published
48347Clarkston —141 0–2 — — Not published
48350Davisburg 8,163630 0–2 — — Not published
48356Highland 8,365956 0–2 — — Not published
48359Lake Orion 10,4017,768 0–2 — — Not published
48360Lake Orion 12,1162,627 0–2 — — Not published
48361Lake Orion —113 0–2 — — Not published
48363Oakland 7,362410 0–2 — — Not published
48367Leonard 4,668307 0–2 — — Not published
48370Oxford 1,777151 0–2 — — Not published
48371Oxford 25,9724,925 0–2 — — Not published
48374Novi 17,6726,466 0–2 — — Not published
48376Novi —98 0–2 — — Not published
48377Novi 19,81625,952 0–2 — — Not published
48380Milford 7,1256,640 0–2 — — Not published
48381Milford 14,0945,166 0–2 — — Not published
48383White Lake 13,2851,540 0–2 — — Not published
48442Holly 22,7885,750 0–2 — — Not published
48462Ortonville 13,2791,544 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Auburn Hills

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Auburn Hills retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Auburn Hills retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Auburn Hills retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Oakland County and grocery stores

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 445110 — supermarkets & other grocery stores. Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. BLS QCEW (quarterly) is newer than ZBP — 2026 Q1 shows 212 establishments county-wide for this industry. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (1.55 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.