BizGapMap

Home / Gasoline stations with convenience stores / New York / Monroe County, NY

Monroe County, NY — Gas stations Saturation

How many gas stations exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 53 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Gas stations with a convenience store · Fuel + mart locations. Counted together because official statistics use one 447110 code.

Measured density: Below average — 0.69× the U.S. rate (between 0.69× and 0.83× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 25 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 16 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

Below the U.S. rate   Monroe County gas stations — 69–83% of the U.S. rate

155 gas stations are counted in Monroe County — 1.6 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 69% of the U.S. rate of 2.4.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has stayed roughly flat between 2015 and 2023 (142 → 141).

Measured supply density is highest in 14605 (Rochester), 14467 (Henrietta), 14445 (East Rochester) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 14618 (Rochester), 14580 (Webster), 14626 (Rochester).

Census County Business Patterns (2023) puts the county-wide count at 168 establishments, including locations in ZIP codes that do not map to a ZCTA — so it can run slightly above the sum of the ZIP rows on this page. It is annual, so it lags more than QCEW.

Measured density: Monroe County sits at 69% of the U.S. rate for gas stations. 16 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 69% and 83% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 14605 and 14467; the lowest measured density is in 14618 and 14580.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing gas stations and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Gas stations
155–205
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (25 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
1.6
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
2.4
per 10,000 present
County index
0.69×
vs. U.S.
Latest year (CBP)
168
2023 — $52M annual payroll
Residents
753,585
43 ZIPs with data
Workers
345,001
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
752,202
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
−0.7%
−5,545 people
Net migration 2024
+888
international +3,666, domestic −2,778
Jobs located here
379,674
LODES 2022, −6.2% since 2019

Monroe County had an estimated 752,202 residents on July 1, 2024 — 0.7% fewer than in 2020 (−5,545). In the latest year it gained 1,301 people: births minus deaths +416, international migration +3,666, domestic migration −2,778. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

379,674 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (−6.2% since 2019), and 342,881 employed residents lived there (−5.6% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
14627 Rochester
+34.5%
14618 Rochester
+12.7%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change

No ZIP had a statistically significant decrease.

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses

Not shown. Census publishes gasoline stations only as a broader 2022 grouping (NAICS 4571) that also includes other fuel retailers, so a convenience-store-gas-station-only nonemployer count is not published.

Census Nonemployer Statistics 2024 (NAICS 2022). We do not approximate this figure.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more gas stations in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — down 1% since 2015

Number of gas stations in Monroe County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

142
2015
171
2018
159
2020
146
2021
153
2022
141
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
14605 Rochester
201%
14467 Henrietta
142%
14445 East Rochester
138%
14472 Honeoye Falls
127%
14624 Rochester
126%
14420 Brockport
109%
14620 Rochester
102%
14623 Rochester
101%
14526 Penfield
96%
14615 Rochester
94%
14609 Rochester
88%
14468 Hilton
87%
14608 Rochester
85%
14607 Rochester
85%
14613 Rochester
78%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
14618 Rochester
38%
14580 Webster
40%
14626 Rochester
47%
14616 Rochester
59%
14450 Fairport
60%
14611 Rochester
63%
14534 Pittsford
67%
14586 West Henrietta
67%
14612 Rochester
68%
14621 Rochester
72%
14610 Rochester
75%
14606 Rochester
77%
14613 Rochester
78%
14607 Rochester
85%
14608 Rochester
85%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few gas stations may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

Employment hubs & destinations

These ZIPs have far more workers (or visitors) than residents, so their counts are driven by daytime and visitor demand — not a place to read "shortage" from resident numbers alone.

ZIPNeighborhoodType ResidentsWorkersGas stationsIndex
14604Rochester Employment hub 3,25111,871 0–2 —
14614Rochester Employment hub 1,1586,804 0–2 —
14627Rochester Employment hub 3,15913,485 0–2 —

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = gas stations per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersGas stations Per 10kIndexStatus
14605Rochester 11,7835,863 7 4.8 201% High density
14467Henrietta 10,1683,486 4 3.4 142% Above average
14445East Rochester 7,5293,295 3 3.3 138% Above average
14472Honeoye Falls 9,0391,915 3 3.0 127% Above average
14624Rochester 38,62623,332 15 3.0 126% Above average
14420Brockport 20,3755,555 6 2.6 109% Above average
14620Rochester 23,76926,709 9 2.4 102% Above average
14623Rochester 26,03248,230 12 2.4 101% Above average
14526Penfield 19,6294,602 5 2.3 96% Below average
14615Rochester 17,8848,948 5 2.2 94% Below average
14609Rochester 40,2746,041 9 2.1 88% Below average
14468Hilton 18,5261,626 4 2.1 87% Below average
14608Rochester 12,7924,126 3 2.0 85% Below average
14607Rochester 17,89113,762 5 2.0 85% Below average
14613Rochester 15,0472,328 3 1.9 78% Below average
14606Rochester 25,53814,496 6 1.8 77% Below average
14610Rochester 14,3115,272 3 1.8 75% Below average
14621Rochester 32,38117,293 7 1.7 72% Below average
14612Rochester 35,1524,557 6 1.6 68% Below average
14586West Henrietta 13,29111,207 3 1.6 67% Below average
14534Pittsford 33,2309,519 6 1.6 67% Below average
14611Rochester 17,1455,932 3 1.5 63% Below average
14450Fairport 42,75012,224 7 1.4 60% Below average
14616Rochester 26,8633,581 4 1.4 59% Below average
14626Rochester 29,27312,945 4 1.1 47% Far below average
14580Webster 54,18018,304 6 0.9 40% Far below average
14618Rochester 25,47615,289 3 0.9 38% Far below average
14410Adams Basin —39 0–2 — — Not published
14428Churchville 8,127879 0–2 — — Not published
14430Clarkson —110 0–2 — — Not published
14464Hamlin 6,755667 0–2 — — Not published
14506Mendon 923601 0–2 — — Not published
14511Mumford 548119 0–2 — — Not published
14514North Chili 6,5721,288 0–2 — — Not published
14515North Greece 21515 0–2 — — Not published
14543Rush 3,7171,081 0–2 — — Not published
14546Scottsville 4,4501,469 0–2 — — Not published
14559Spencerport 17,2002,864 0–2 — — Not published
14602Rochester —56 4 — — Not published
14603Rochester —180 0–2 — — Not published
14604Rochester 3,25111,871 0–2 — — Not published
14614Rochester 1,1586,804 0–2 — — Not published
14617Rochester 21,7883,287 0–2 — — Not published
14619Rochester 13,477974 0–2 — — Not published
14622Rochester 12,5742,273 0–2 — — Not published
14625Rochester 10,7176,887 0–2 — — Not published
14627Rochester 3,15913,485 0–2 — — Not published
14638Rochester —4 0–2 — — Not published
14642Rochester 0127 0–2 — — Not published
14649Rochester —139 0–2 — — Not published
14650Rochester —308 0–2 — — Not published
14652Rochester —518 0–2 — — Not published
14692Rochester —861 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Rochester

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Rochester retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Rochester retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Rochester retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Monroe County and gas stations

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 447110 — gasoline stations with convenience stores. Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. This industry has no clean QCEW series, so the freshest county signal is Census County Business Patterns 2023: 168 establishments and $52M in annual payroll county-wide. This count includes locations in ZIP codes that do not map to a ZCTA, so it can be slightly higher than the sum of the ZIP rows. CBP is annual and slower than QCEW. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (2.37 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.