BizGapMap

Home / Limited-service restaurants (fast food) / Washington / King County, WA

King County, WA — Fast food Saturation

How many fast food exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 113 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Fast food · Quick-service restaurants · Takeout & delivery counters · Pizza delivery · Sandwich & burger chains. Counted together because official statistics use one 722513 code.

Measured density: Below average — 0.89× the U.S. rate (between 0.89× and 0.90× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 40 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 10 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

Range spans the U.S. rate   King County fast food — 89–90% of the U.S. rate

1,769 fast food are counted in King County — 6.0 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 89% of the U.S. rate of 6.7.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has stayed roughly flat between 2015 and 2023 (1,726 → 1,761).

Measured supply density is highest in 98148 (Seattle), 98166 (Seattle), 98105 (Seattle) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 98075 (Sammamish), 98178 (Seattle), 98058 (Renton).

BLS QCEW puts the latest county-wide count (2026 Q1) at 1,647 establishments, the freshest available signal.

Measured density: King County sits at 89% of the U.S. rate for fast food. 10 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 89% and 90% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 98148 and 98166; the lowest measured density is in 98075 and 98178.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing fast food and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Fast food
1,769–1,849
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (40 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
6.0
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
6.7
per 10,000 present
County index
0.89×
vs. U.S.
Latest quarter (QCEW)
1,647
2026 Q1 — county total
Residents
2,298,524
82 ZIPs with data
Workers
1,295,866
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
2,340,211
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
+2.9%
+65,862 people
Net migration 2024
+35,932
international +48,433, domestic −12,501
Jobs located here
1,462,772
LODES 2022, +6.0% since 2019

King County had an estimated 2,340,211 residents on July 1, 2024 — 2.9% more than in 2020 (+65,862). In the latest year it gained 43,398 people: births minus deaths +7,415, international migration +48,433, domestic migration −12,501. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

1,462,772 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (+6.0% since 2019), and 1,114,772 employed residents lived there (+4.5% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
98101 Seattle
+27.1%
98010 Black Diamond
+22.4%
98034 Kirkland
+20.8%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
98024 Fall City
−43.3%
98148 Seattle
−20.0%
98011 Bothell
−14.4%

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses (no paid employees)

Nonemployer businesses
293
no paid employees (2024)
Receipts
$22.4M
published gross receipts
Receipts per business
$76K
gross, not profit

Census Nonemployer Statistics counts businesses with no paid employees — a separate universe from the employer establishments counted above; a business is in one or the other, never both. They are not storefronts by definition: many are home-based, mobile, or part-time.

We show them beside the density index, not inside it. In categories such as nail and beauty salons, child care, and pet care, one-person businesses can outnumber employer establishments, so the employer-only count understates how many businesses exist. That is not evidence of higher demand.

Receipts are gross revenue reported for these businesses — not profit, and not the size of the local market. Census publishes this only at county level, so it is not shown on the ZIP map. See methodology.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more fast food in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — up 2% since 2015

Number of fast food in King County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

1,726
2015
1,837
2018
1,722
2020
1,722
2021
1,772
2022
1,761
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
98148 Seattle
206%
98166 Seattle
149%
98105 Seattle
146%
98188 Seattle
143%
98107 Seattle
141%
98003 Federal Way
139%
98121 Seattle
129%
98007 Bellevue
126%
98122 Seattle
126%
98032 Kent
123%
98002 Auburn
122%
98133 Seattle
118%
98072 Woodinville
117%
98045 North Bend
115%
98004 Bellevue
111%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
98075 Sammamish
23%
98178 Seattle
27%
98058 Renton
30%
98077 Woodinville
31%
98053 Redmond
35%
98092 Auburn
40%
98168 Seattle
41%
98126 Seattle
42%
98106 Seattle
42%
98059 Renton
44%
98177 Seattle
48%
98065 Snoqualmie
48%
98119 Seattle
49%
98117 Seattle
51%
98070 Vashon
54%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few fast food may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

Employment hubs & destinations

These ZIPs have far more workers (or visitors) than residents, so their counts are driven by daytime and visitor demand — not a place to read "shortage" from resident numbers alone.

ZIPNeighborhoodType ResidentsWorkersFast foodIndex
98104Seattle Employment hub 16,54263,710 69 214%
98057Renton Employment hub 12,70541,810 46 205%
98101Seattle Employment hub 17,15396,469 84 193%
98134Seattle Destination 64539,386 17 125%
98050Preston Employment hub 1081,014 0–2 —
98164Seattle Employment hub 2922,891 0–2 —
98195Seattle Employment hub 2,7578,614 0–2 —
98288Skykomish Employment hub 169477 0–2 —

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = fast food per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersFast food Per 10kIndexStatus
98104Seattle 16,54263,710 69 14.3 214% High density
98148Seattle 9,7153,818 16 13.8 206% High density
98057Renton 12,70541,810 46 13.7 205% High density
98101Seattle 17,15396,469 84 12.8 193% High density
98166Seattle 22,0826,025 25 10.0 149% Above average
98105Seattle 49,76721,275 59 9.8 146% Above average
98188Seattle 27,31143,850 47 9.5 143% Above average
98107Seattle 28,77614,757 34 9.4 141% Above average
98003Federal Way 51,61921,771 58 9.3 139% Above average
98121Seattle 21,16634,570 33 8.6 129% Above average
98007Bellevue 27,69215,738 30 8.4 126% Above average
98122Seattle 43,23427,645 48 8.4 126% Above average
98134Seattle 64539,386 17 8.4 125% Above average
98032Kent 40,86259,428 58 8.2 123% Above average
98002Auburn 37,50915,645 37 8.2 122% Above average
98133Seattle 53,24915,774 48 7.9 118% Above average
98072Woodinville 24,44623,071 28 7.8 117% Above average
98045North Bend 15,2893,325 13 7.7 115% Above average
98004Bellevue 39,89774,258 57 7.4 111% Above average
98027Issaquah 28,95522,093 28 7.0 105% Above average
98006Bellevue 40,00915,660 32 6.7 100% Above average
98103Seattle 52,67125,838 43 6.6 98% Below average
98038Maple Valley 37,3246,029 26 6.4 97% Below average
98034Kirkland 52,53122,274 40 6.3 94% Below average
98109Seattle 34,32868,378 43 6.3 94% Below average
98019Duvall 12,2421,647 8 6.1 92% Below average
98055Renton 24,66023,311 22 6.1 91% Below average
98056Renton 35,8494,257 23 6.1 91% Below average
98116Seattle 28,7116,402 19 6.0 89% Below average
98030Kent 38,5234,672 24 5.9 88% Below average
98029Issaquah 30,5868,592 20 5.7 86% Below average
98033Kirkland 40,98226,821 31 5.7 85% Below average
98005Bellevue 21,84627,375 20 5.6 84% Below average
98031Kent 40,0948,748 25 5.6 84% Below average
98144Seattle 33,78711,888 22 5.5 83% Below average
98108Seattle 25,52929,689 22 5.4 82% Below average
98125Seattle 44,5209,397 26 5.3 79% Below average
98011Bothell 28,96313,644 18 5.0 75% Below average
98022Enumclaw 22,4186,856 13 5.0 75% Below average
98118Seattle 50,5008,751 27 4.9 74% Below average
98008Bellevue 27,2426,622 15 4.9 74% Below average
98198Seattle 40,4636,976 21 4.8 72% Below average
98115Seattle 54,34911,038 28 4.7 70% Below average
98023Federal Way 50,4483,990 24 4.6 69% Below average
98052Redmond 80,717106,441 60 4.5 67% Below average
98047Pacific 6,8174,522 4 4.4 66% Below average
98136Seattle 17,2522,026 8 4.4 66% Below average
98155Seattle 36,5114,619 16 4.1 62% Below average
98074Sammamish 30,7612,868 13 4.0 61% Below average
98001Auburn 37,46029,403 21 4.0 60% Below average
98199Seattle 22,4684,960 10 4.0 60% Below average
98028Kenmore 23,7413,227 10 3.9 59% Below average
98042Kent 50,2167,063 21 3.9 59% Below average
98040Mercer Island 25,3077,524 11 3.8 57% Below average
98146Seattle 28,5732,223 11 3.7 56% Below average
98102Seattle 27,33310,504 12 3.7 55% Below average
98112Seattle 23,9216,614 10 3.7 55% Below average
98070Vashon 9,9342,416 4 3.6 54% Below average
98117Seattle 35,7114,293 13 3.4 51% Below average
98119Seattle 26,87920,382 12 3.2 49% Far below average
98065Snoqualmie 15,9445,392 6 3.2 48% Far below average
98177Seattle 21,0901,698 7 3.2 48% Far below average
98059Renton 42,4064,262 13 2.9 44% Far below average
98106Seattle 28,6906,209 9 2.8 42% Far below average
98126Seattle 22,9754,021 7 2.8 42% Far below average
98168Seattle 35,52816,934 12 2.7 41% Far below average
98092Auburn 50,2243,898 14 2.7 40% Far below average
98053Redmond 22,7655,764 6 2.3 35% Far below average
98077Woodinville 14,1091,191 3 2.0 31% Far below average
98058Renton 42,9803,663 9 2.0 30% Far below average
98178Seattle 26,7481,850 5 1.8 27% Far below average
98075Sammamish 25,4982,019 4 1.5 23% Far below average
98009Bellevue —289 0–2 — — Not published
98010Black Diamond 6,8571,045 0–2 — — Not published
98013Burton —2 0–2 — — Not published
98014Carnation 8,2641,148 0–2 — — Not published
98015Bellevue —29 0–2 — — Not published
98024Fall City 3,908546 0–2 — — Not published
98025Hobart 523 0–2 — — Not published
98035Kent —236 0–2 — — Not published
98039Medina 2,928408 0–2 — — Not published
98041Bothell —867 0–2 — — Not published
98050Preston 1081,014 0–2 — — Not published
98051Ravensdale 3,442461 0–2 — — Not published
98062Seahurst —13 0–2 — — Not published
98063Federal Way —229 0–2 — — Not published
98064Kent —77 0–2 — — Not published
98071Auburn —635 0–2 — — Not published
98073Redmond —1,109 0–2 — — Not published
98083Kirkland —235 0–2 — — Not published
98093Federal Way —20 0–2 — — Not published
98111Seattle —376 0–2 — — Not published
98113Seattle —49 0–2 — — Not published
98114Seattle —92 0–2 — — Not published
98124Seattle —367 0–2 — — Not published
98127Seattle —22 0–2 — — Not published
98138Seattle —77 0–2 — — Not published
98139Seattle —30 0–2 — — Not published
98145Seattle —36 0–2 — — Not published
98154Seattle 02,163 0–2 — — Not published
98158Seattle 011,629 11 — — Not published
98160Seattle —34 0–2 — — Not published
98161Seattle —546 0–2 — — Not published
98164Seattle 2922,891 0–2 — — Not published
98165Seattle —26 0–2 — — Not published
98170Seattle —19 0–2 — — Not published
98174Seattle 022 0–2 — — Not published
98175Seattle —8 0–2 — — Not published
98181Seattle —23 0–2 — — Not published
98191Seattle —693 0–2 — — Not published
98194Seattle —4 0–2 — — Not published
98195Seattle 2,7578,614 0–2 — — Not published
98288Skykomish 169477 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Redmond

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Redmond retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Redmond retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Redmond retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow King County and fast food

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 722513 — limited-service restaurants. Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. BLS QCEW (quarterly) is newer than ZBP — 2026 Q1 shows 1,647 establishments county-wide for this industry. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (6.67 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.