BizGapMap

Home / Limited-service restaurants (fast food) / Alabama / Madison County, AL

Madison County, AL — Fast food Saturation

How many fast food exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 30 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Fast food · Quick-service restaurants · Takeout & delivery counters · Pizza delivery · Sandwich & burger chains. Counted together because official statistics use one 722513 code.

Measured density: Above average — 1.20× the U.S. rate (between 1.20× and 1.23× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 13 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 5 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

Above the U.S. rate   Madison County fast food — 120–123% of the U.S. rate

401 fast food are counted in Madison County — 8.0 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 120% of the U.S. rate of 6.7.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has risen 21% between 2015 and 2023 (324 → 391). That set is smaller than today's county total. 2020–2021 were pandemic-distorted, and Census rounds counts, so small moves are within noise.

Measured supply density is highest in 35816 (Huntsville), 35758 (Madison), 35802 (Huntsville) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 35757 (Madison), 35824 (Huntsville), 35810 (Huntsville).

BLS QCEW puts the latest county-wide count (2026 Q1) at 511 establishments, the freshest available signal.

Measured density: Madison County sits at 120% of the U.S. rate for fast food. 5 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 120% and 123% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 35816 and 35758; the lowest measured density is in 35757 and 35824.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing fast food and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Fast food
401–427
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (13 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
8.0
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
6.7
per 10,000 present
County index
1.20×
vs. U.S.
Latest quarter (QCEW)
511
2026 Q1 — county total
Residents
409,415
22 ZIPs with data
Workers
185,010
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
423,355
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
+8.4%
+32,828 people
Net migration 2024
+8,680
international +2,014, domestic +6,666
Jobs located here
206,619
LODES 2022, +7.0% since 2019

Madison County had an estimated 423,355 residents on July 1, 2024 — 8.4% more than in 2020 (+32,828). In the latest year it gained 9,464 people: births minus deaths +793, international migration +2,014, domestic migration +6,666. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

206,619 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (+7.0% since 2019), and 164,330 employed residents lived there (+5.2% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
35759 Meridianville
+73.8%
35749 Harvest
+34.7%
35806 Huntsville
+26.7%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change

No ZIP had a statistically significant decrease.

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses (no paid employees)

Nonemployer businesses
66
no paid employees (2024)
Receipts
$4.0M
published gross receipts
Receipts per business
$61K
gross, not profit

Census Nonemployer Statistics counts businesses with no paid employees — a separate universe from the employer establishments counted above; a business is in one or the other, never both. They are not storefronts by definition: many are home-based, mobile, or part-time.

We show them beside the density index, not inside it. In categories such as nail and beauty salons, child care, and pet care, one-person businesses can outnumber employer establishments, so the employer-only count understates how many businesses exist. That is not evidence of higher demand.

Receipts are gross revenue reported for these businesses — not profit, and not the size of the local market. Census publishes this only at county level, so it is not shown on the ZIP map. See methodology.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more fast food in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — up 21% since 2015

Number of fast food in Madison County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

324
2015
342
2018
355
2020
359
2021
375
2022
391
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
35816 Huntsville
249%
35758 Madison
198%
35802 Huntsville
194%
35759 Meridianville
173%
35801 Huntsville
170%
35806 Huntsville
130%
35750 Hazel Green
127%
35805 Huntsville
125%
35748 Gurley
115%
35803 Huntsville
106%
35811 Huntsville
94%
35749 Harvest
77%
35763 Owens Cross Roads
63%
35810 Huntsville
63%
35824 Huntsville
63%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
35757 Madison
23%
35824 Huntsville
63%
35810 Huntsville
63%
35763 Owens Cross Roads
63%
35749 Harvest
77%
35811 Huntsville
94%
35803 Huntsville
106%
35748 Gurley
115%
35805 Huntsville
125%
35750 Hazel Green
127%
35806 Huntsville
130%
35801 Huntsville
170%
35759 Meridianville
173%
35802 Huntsville
194%
35758 Madison
198%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few fast food may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

Employment hubs & destinations

These ZIPs have far more workers (or visitors) than residents, so their counts are driven by daytime and visitor demand — not a place to read "shortage" from resident numbers alone.

ZIPNeighborhoodType ResidentsWorkersFast foodIndex
35808Huntsville Employment hub 1,1532,913 0–2 —

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = fast food per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersFast food Per 10kIndexStatus
35816Huntsville 15,9397,829 33 16.6 249% High density
35758Madison 50,26622,205 81 13.2 198% High density
35802Huntsville 23,85810,945 38 13.0 194% High density
35759Meridianville 14,1031,310 17 11.5 173% High density
35801Huntsville 23,35738,163 48 11.3 170% High density
35806Huntsville 29,16138,882 42 8.6 130% Above average
35750Hazel Green 13,4131,512 12 8.5 127% Above average
35805Huntsville 20,85620,627 26 8.3 125% Above average
35760New Hope 4,643339 4 8.3 125% Above average
35748Gurley 7,578536 6 7.6 115% Above average
35803Huntsville 29,1976,771 23 7.1 106% Above average
35811Huntsville 31,0088,247 22 6.3 94% Below average
35749Harvest 30,7101,272 16 5.1 77% Below average
35763Owens Cross Roads 19,8193,319 9 4.2 63% Below average
35810Huntsville 32,8436,004 15 4.2 63% Below average
35824Huntsville 9,6459,450 6 4.2 63% Below average
35757Madison 18,5291,701 3 1.5 23% Far below average
35741Brownsboro 4,571774 0–2 — — Not published
35761New Market 13,557337 0–2 — — Not published
35773Toney 14,606804 0–2 — — Not published
35804Huntsville —256 0–2 — — Not published
35807Huntsville —92 0–2 — — Not published
35808Huntsville 1,1532,913 0–2 — — Not published
35809Huntsville —28 0–2 — — Not published
35812Huntsville —536 0–2 — — Not published
35814Huntsville —2,238 0–2 — — Not published
35815Huntsville —46 0–2 — — Not published
35896Huntsville 6031,070 0–2 — — Not published
35898Huntsville —2,407 0–2 — — Not published
35899Huntsville —51 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Huntsville

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Huntsville retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Huntsville retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Huntsville retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Madison County and fast food

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 722513 — limited-service restaurants. Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. BLS QCEW (quarterly) is newer than ZBP — 2026 Q1 shows 511 establishments county-wide for this industry. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (6.67 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.