Home / Bars & drinking places / Texas
How many bars exist per person present (residents + daytime workers) across the 36 Texas counties we cover, by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Data: Census ZBP 2023 + ACS 2024 + BLS QCEW.
Includes: Bars & taverns · Pubs & brewpubs (drinking-focused) · Cocktail & wine bars · Taprooms. Counted together because official statistics use one 722410 code.
| City | County | Bars | Residents | Workers | Per 10k | Index | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corpus Christi | Nueces County | 76–124 | 351,950 | 130,507 | 1.8 | 181–242% | High density |
| Austin | Travis County | 278–374 | 1,302,098 | 733,329 | 1.7 | 165–195% | High density |
| New Braunfels | Comal County | 40–48 | 215,245 | 64,040 | 1.6 | 160–184% | High density |
| Wichita Falls | Wichita County | 24–42 | 136,053 | 45,003 | 1.5 | 150–238% | High density |
| League City | Galveston County | 63–93 | 379,923 | 101,205 | 1.5 | 145–191% | Range spans bands |
| College Station | Brazos County | 39–59 | 241,659 | 78,858 | 1.4 | 138–166% | Range spans bands |
| El Paso | El Paso County | 126–180 | 871,270 | 253,085 | 1.3 | 125–157% | Range spans bands |
| San Antonio | Bexar County | 298–384 | 2,044,549 | 788,736 | 1.2 | 121–145% | Above average |
| Odessa | Ector County | 24–40 | 171,416 | 72,071 | 1.2 | 115–153% | Range spans bands |
| Schertz | Guadalupe County | 19–31 | 157,840 | 50,580 | 1.0 | 103–146% | Above average |
| Abilene | Taylor County | 18–44 | 154,753 | 57,557 | 1.0 | 97–194% | Range spans bands |
| Midland | Midland County | 21–35 | 168,494 | 91,917 | 1.0 | 97–116% | Range spans bands |
| Lubbock | Lubbock County | 34–76 | 311,047 | 122,184 | 0.9 | 91–155% | Range spans bands |
| Amarillo | Randall County | 14–28 | 144,098 | 41,104 | 0.9 | 84–157% | Range spans bands |
| San Marcos | Hays County | 27–39 | 286,831 | 81,054 | 0.8 | 82–112% | Range spans bands |
| Harlingen | Cameron County | 39–65 | 425,007 | 121,999 | 0.8 | 80–116% | Range spans bands |
| Houston | Harris County | 473–773 | 4,866,005 | 2,159,333 | 0.8 | 79–102% | Range spans bands |
| Woodway | McLennan County | 21–69 | 270,919 | 111,818 | 0.6 | 64–185% | Range spans bands |
| Temple | Bell County | 27–63 | 399,960 | 95,282 | 0.6 | 60–117% | Range spans bands |
| Dallas | Dallas County | 217–429 | 2,736,443 | 1,654,497 | 0.6 | 59–91% | Range spans bands |
| Fort Worth | Tarrant County | 147–277 | 2,091,100 | 824,477 | 0.6 | 58–93% | Range spans bands |
| Cedar Park | Williamson County | 45–83 | 691,052 | 187,105 | 0.6 | 57–87% | Range spans bands |
| Beaumont | Jefferson County | 15–53 | 252,884 | 102,594 | 0.5 | 49–134% | Range spans bands |
| Spring | Montgomery County | 35–69 | 671,730 | 197,300 | 0.5 | 45–79% | Range spans bands |
| Laredo | Webb County | 14–28 | 269,130 | 83,205 | 0.5 | 45–83% | Range spans bands |
| Frisco | Denton County | 48–98 | 978,658 | 345,999 | 0.4 | 41–76% | Range spans bands |
| Sugar Land | Fort Bend County | 38–70 | 855,396 | 228,133 | 0.4 | 39–65% | Range spans bands |
| Mcallen | Hidalgo County | 33–87 | 891,915 | 226,099 | 0.3 | 33–80% | Range spans bands |
| Tyler | Smith County | 7–45 | 247,103 | 98,064 | 0.2 | 23–124% | Range spans bands |
| Plano | Collin County | 25–73 | 1,115,497 | 422,851 | 0.2 | 19–50% | Well below average |
| Pearland | Brazoria County | 8–44 | 410,979 | 98,139 | 0.2 | 17–73% | Range spans bands |
| Burleson | Johnson County | 4–26 | 215,467 | 52,226 | 0.2 | 16–98% | Range spans bands |
| Waxahachie | Ellis County | 0–30 | 222,795 | 52,087 | 0.0 | 0–104% | Range spans bands |
| Terrell | Kaufman County | 0–20 | 183,309 | 36,313 | 0.0 | 0–89% | Range spans bands |
| Weatherford | Parker County | 0–20 | 147,840 | 33,831 | 0.0 | 0–96% | Range spans bands |
| Sherman | Grayson County | 0–36 | 148,078 | 43,079 | 0.0 | 0–199% | Range spans bands |
Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.
← All Bars & drinking places markets nationwide · Methodology · Data sources
BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.